Dissolving the Zionist BackUp Disk

Jewish children about to leave the Buchenwald concentration camp.

The original caption reads, "A group of Jewish children wave good bye to friends at the Buchenwald concentration camp. They have been recently released and are on their way to France; from there some will go to Palestine, some to the U.S."

The Buchenwald children were a group of approximately 1000 Jewish children found by American troops when they liberated the Buchenwald concentration camp on April 11, 1945.

The 'Jews' are 'controversial' people. Some would say they are scapegoated.

Some people think that the 'Jewish Mafia' is the most powerful of all.

"Jewish criminals in America used the 'holocaust' and the slanderous charge of anti-Semitism as a shield to protect their criminal network and extortion rackets by intimidating and silencing those who would dare to expose the monstrous crimes they were involved in." (These are Jewish times)

1922 Holocaust in the Ukraine in the Soviet Union

Some people think that 'Jews' are too powerful in politics.

"The Zionist neoconservatives ... inserted themselves into the driving seats and forced the American people to line-up quietly behind them.

"Through fear and terrorist intimidation, they forced the people to accept a fascist/racist ideology that they would never willingly accept otherwise."

White boy, Santiago McKinn, was taken from his home in the New Mexico Territory in 1885 by Chiricahua Apaches. McKinn assimilated with the Apaches and cried when he was returned to his family. The White Men carried out a 500 year long holocaust in North America. In 1500 there were 12 million Indians; by 1900 there were only 237,000 Indians.

The Neocons "inherited a government of self-seeking 'public servants'...

"Their mentors, the Jewish psychologists and social scientists who were key players in the history of Tavistock, had done their preparatory work very well...

"The Tavistock Institute is a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., consisting of ten major institutions, 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks.

"It is funded by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.

"From these positions of power, they applied the manipulative psychological techniques that had been developed by Sigmund Freud and his students." (BrainwashingAmerica)

VIDEO: Correlating Hegemony, Wars and Psyops, and the need to make money from money.

Video: Auschwitz Survivor

THE ISRAELI CONTROLLED BBC

Lyons

Sir Michael Lyons is the Chairman of the, reportedly, much hated and utterly discredited BBC Trust.

Lyons is a Jew.

Anthony Fry is another of the BBC Trustees.

He has worked for the Rothschild Group.

The Independent (UK newspaper) on 16 April 2009 tells us about the BBC Trust which "is now a mouthpiece for the Israeli lobby." (story here.)

What did Jeremy Bowen do wrong?


Gaius

Marcus Ambrose Paul Agius was appointed the senior non-executive director on the BBC’s executive board.

Born into a Jewish family, Agius is married to Katherine, daughter of Edmund de Rothschild of the Rothschild banking family of England, with two children, and has a close involvement with the Rothschild family estate, Exbury Gardens in Hampshire.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Agius

Sharon had some strange friends.

1. The BBC "is literally behaving like it's the Israeli state broadcaster." - Jews sans frontieres

2. Lenin’s Tomb reminds us of this episode.

"What happened to BBC correspondent Orla Guerin just days after Mark Thompson had his cosy tete-a-tete with that obese blood-drenched old brute Ariel Sharon.

THOMPSON

"Before Thompson took up his position as Director General of the BBC, the Guardian had reported on the ferocious pressure being exerted on news organisations by the Israeli government, including complaints about individual reporters:

The Israeli government has written to the BBC accusing its Middle East correspondent, Orla Guerin, of anti-semitism and "total identification with the goals and methods of the Palestinian terror groups".

"Orla Guerin’s offence was to run stories not just about the grief of Israeli families who had lost family members to suicide bombers but also stories about the grief and suffering of ordinary Palestinian families. As one blogger put it at the time:

Guerin’s real sin, of course, is to show some sympathy for the victims of the Israeli bombing (that’s enough to brand her a “terrorist”).

"Within days of Thompson meeting Sharon, Guerin was sacked as BBC TV Middle East correspondent and transferred to Africa.



Sharon had some strange friends.

3. 'In November 2005, Thompson (the BBC's boss) traveled with his Jewish wife to Israel, where he held direct talks with Sharon, which were intended to let the BBC build bridges with Israel'. - Mark Thomson and the Kosher BBC

4. Mark Thompson has been known to spend his holidays with his Jewish relatives in the USA.

He was educated by the Jesuits.

He is the Director General of the BBC.

He decided not to broadcast a charity appeal to help the stricken people of Gaza rebuild their homes. (BBC crisis over refusal to broadcast Gaza appeal)

The BBC isn't doing well under its Director-General for the past five years, Mark Thompson.

According to Broadcast magazine, on 7 April 2009, the BBC suffered its second worst peaktime performance since at least 2001, managing an audience share of only 5.3 per cent.

(With less than a million viewers, BBC licence fee is as hard to ...)

Thompson should be sacked.

Over the Gaza Appeal incident, Mark Thompson received backing from the BBC Trust's chairman, Sir Michael Lyons, who is Jewish.

Sir Michael Lyons should be sacked.


Photo of Ed Vaizey by Kaihsu

ED VAIZEY, the UK CONSERVATIVE Party Culture Minister reveals himself to be a Zionist Jew when he says (Reaction to BBC Gaza appeal row ):

"The trouble with broadcasting an appeal from a war zone, is that there are two sides to the argument - and that's what I think we're seeing here.

"That's why I think the BBC should be allowed to make the argument that it wants to preserve its impartiality on the issue."

Sack Ed Vaizey!

Stars vow to shun BBC for refusing to broadcast Gaza appeal

Staff anger over BBC’s refusal to broadcast Gaza appeal

Rowan Williams accuses BBC of ignoring faithful

~~

Wiseman, Warburg, Cecil and World War

Sir William Wiseman, the Jewish head of British intelligence in the USA, who, during World war I, was reportedly friendly with Max Warburg, the Jewish head of German intelligence.


What were the reasons for World War One?

Some people blame Imperialism.

For example, the Austrian Empire and the Russian Empire clashed over Serbia; the British Empire, the German Empire and Turkish Empire had clashing interests in Iraq.

Some people blame Militaristic Nationalism. There were plenty of Germans and Englishmen who looked forward to a fight.

What role was played by Zionist bankers?

AGAINST ZIONISM has a post entitled LUCIFER MURDERS AN ANGEL which argues that in 1914 a cabal of Jewish bankers wanted a war in order to:

1. Destroy certain empires.

2. Build a large private banking empire.

Have Zionist Jews occupying key positions in international banks in Europe and North America.

Have the bankers use the weapon of debt to control people and nations.

3. Obtain the promise of a Jewish homeland - the Balfour Declaration.

4. Make lots of money.

Edith Cavell

Among the points made:

1. In 1914, Edith Cavell, an English nurse, was running a teaching hospital in Brussels in Belgium.

2. On 20 August 1914, German troops entered Brussels and turned Edith's hospital into a Red Cross Hospital for German soldiers. Edith began caring for German soldiers.

3. Secretly, Edith was also caring for British, French and Dutch soldiers who entered the same hospital disguised as Belgian labourers.

4. Edith took charge of the Belgian Relief Commission which aimed to get food and medical supplies to war-ravaged Belgium.

Allied charities sent huge amounts of food and medicine to Belgium.

But one day Edith discovered that certain people in Britain were making sure all these supplies ended up in the German Empire.

She discovered that Jewish-owned banks in England were sending money to the Germans to help them buy these supplies.

This was causing famine in Belgium.

5. Edith wrote a letter of protest to a British magazine The Nursing Mirror, which published the letter on 15 April 1915.

6. Edith’s letter was shown to Sir William Wiseman, a Jew who was high up in British Intelligence.

Reportedly, Wiseman contacted Max Warburg, the Jew in charge of German Intelligence, and told Warburg to execute Edith as a British spy.

Max Warburg

Wiseman also contacted Max’s brother Paul, the Jewish head of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Thousands of Germans wrote letters to their government demanding that Edith be released.

Americans wrote to the British Red Cross; but the head of the British Red Cross was Robert Cecil, reportedly a Jew.

Edith was shot.

Robert Cecil, who had Jewish origins, became a minister in Britain's government.

7. The British Naval Attaché in Scandinavia, Rear Admiral M.P. Consett, kept track of the movement of war supplies from the Jewish bankers to the Germans.

Consett, in his book Triumph of the Unarmed Forces (published 1923), writes that if the bankers had not continually supplied Germany with money and materials, then World War I would have ended in less than a year.

German U-boats were made from Swedish iron ore; Swedish vessels bringing iron ore to Germany needed coal, and coal was controlled by Britain.

Reportedly, the Jewish bankers sent coal to Swedish ship owners.

Rear Admiral Consett protested.

An earlier Robert Cecil was the brains behind the Gunpowder Plot of 1605, a notorious act of fake terrorism.


Robert Cecil, the British Minister of 'Blockade', was reportedly a friend of the Jewish bankers.

Reportedly, Robert Cecil told Admiral Consett to keep quiet.

Germany also needed glycerin (animal fat) to manufacture explosives. England controlled the world glycerin trade.

The Jewish bankers sold glycerin to neutral countries, which sold it to Germany.

Lusitania

8. Reportedly, William Wiseman, the Jewish head of British Intelligence in the United States, made sure there were no British warships available to protect ocean liners at key locations.

The Lusitania was sunk by German torpedoes. The USA entered the war.

~~

Become an expert on international Jewish Capital

Kuala Lumpur from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Melancholia_i

Mostaque Ali (http://mostaqueali.blogspot.com/) has written about The Root cause of failure in certain Muslim Countries. :

The problem of Muslim countries existing in the bottom of the Third World, with low levels of growth with often harsh autocratic governments can be attributed to many factors.

It is not merely the result of "Western oppression", though that may be a significant factor.

One must also look at the weaknesses of Third World regimes in themselves and the wider society from which their governments are chosen to explain why so many Muslim nations fail.

It is this weakness that predatory Western powers such as the USA, and UK feed on, as it is in their nature.

But here again we must look at the work of specific groups in Western society who shape policy for countries such as the USA, namely Jewish groups.

So to summarize it is not a Muslim vs Christian thing, but rather 1) Weaknesses in Muslim societies. 2) Predatory usually Capitalist, usually Jewish groups exploit the local situation for their geo-strategic and financial schemes.

SOLUTION:

Become an expert on international Jewish Capital; become an expert in their way of thinking and how they operate, and then beat them if you can at their own game. They are human after all.

They also suffer significant criminal tendencies involving money, financial transactions, sex, narcotics, gambling......and the worst source of all the lust for power and total control because their local rabbi taught them at aged 10 it is in their destiny.

Such things one can term Jew weaknesses which subject to proper investigation by righteous groups can reveal their true nature, and the numerous gentiles with whom they work.

Their strengths are:

1. The Western media which creates popular consciousness, and allows the Jew perception management, what is important etc.....

2. Financial strength, running the major banks of the world, especially in the West..........

3. Finally security domination, again especially in the West, and the control of major intelligence and other security organizations which gives them a lot of unofficial power.

These factors are the reasons why Jews like creating "security situations" like war, or low level insurgency because Jews feel they can control such situations, through the media, through banks, and through security.

The need to "secure" and "expand"

Israel's boundaries is one major factor for the hostile stance of Western governments such as the USA and UK, TWO COUNTRIES DOMINATED BY JEWS, towards Muslim nations and the subsequent covert problems such nations suffer.

It is in this Jewish led narrative of Israel's interests are the same as that of the Christian West (Our struggle against Muslims is your struggle) that much of the problems of Muslim nations can be identified at its source.

Or to put it in a faux Ahmedinejad way, so long as Israel exists, in its present condition, Muslim nations will face "difficult" times ahead for many decades to come, as the Jewish dominated West continues to justify false actions against fake actors in the vicinity of Muslim countries in the name of GWOT, an open ended Jewish war against Muslims, that pits western security against Muslim nations covertly and overtly.

There is a need to expose this fake nature of this false struggle between "radical Islam" and the "West".

"Clash of Civilization" as stated originally by the Jew British agent of influence in Washington Bernard Lewis and later sanctified by Samuel Huntington in influential American circles in the early 1990's just as the Cold War had ended.

You and I both know who created the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1920's, al-Qaeda, Hamas, the Taliban...and for what purpose, and even though these falsely created organizations exist they do not themselves carry out many of the terrorist acts that happen around the world, but provide cover for state agencies in their acts, and thus the justifications.

~~

Mostaque Ali also comments on Malaysia, a successful Moslem country (Malaysia a poster child of Muslim success? ):

And so I also speculate as to why Malaysia is successful.

A good pertinent question to pose. Whether the thesis has credibility in relation to Pakistan and other Muslim countries interests me and I imagine a lot of other people curious and concerned for the outcomes of such countries.

I would attribute Malaysia's success to many factors, and not just one, two, or three.

Malaysia is a second world country now with real per Capita income around $15,000 (2009), and is on target to becoming a first world country by "2020" which is its program name. I think it can achieve this realistically.

So why is Malaysia successful, when the vast majority of Muslim countries still slumber in the Third World?

1) I believe Malaysia's present success has a lot to do with its resource wealth. It has a lot of exportable resources, juxtaposed with a small population.

But that in itself would not alone explain the countries success. Zaire or the DRC in Africa also has huge wealth, but is very poor with little development.

2) Malaysia was fortunate to have a good leader. Mohammed Mahatir ruling the country for 22 years. He was not corrupt but loved his country ardently. He was intelligent and understood the basic essentials of economics.

He understood global politics far more than the average Third World leader. Through his astute guidance he made Malaysia successful.

3) Malaysia was a colony of the British, and to a great extent how the colonial master behaves towards your country, both overtly and covertly determines how successful a country becomes even after the British let go the reins of power into their chosen successors in that ex-colony.

Looking at Malaysian/British relations there does not seem to have been any great conflict, except for the Communist insurgency by ethnic Chinese in the Malay peninsula.

By contrast not too far away in both Pakistan and later Bangladesh the British exercised a very negative posture against both countries covertly, especially Bangladesh, both independently or with collaboration with America.

There are various historical factors for this....though certainly not justifiable....but as they say its the luck of the draw.

Malaysia is a Muslim country as are Pakistan and Bangladesh, BUT the British applied different standards. My assumption is that the British shielded Malaysia from American Jewish interference and intrigue, and Mahatirs long and successful tenure as PM was not merely the result of his "genius".

4) It is easier for the British or Americans to be benevolent towards 16 million Moslems in Malaysia than the 200 million Muslims in Indonesia, or the 140 million in Bangladesh or the 180 million in Pakistan. It is likewise easy for the British and USA to be benevolent towards the UAE or Kuwait both enjoying high living standards, but not Iran or Turkey......you understand.

5) Malaysia has a sizable ethnic population of Chinese----about 30%. The Chinese are a talented, intelligent, and hard working race, and a considerable determining factor for Malaysia's current success must be attributed to the ethnic Chinese community.

Though certainly being biased, as I am from South Asia originally, Bangladesh and Pakistan have many remarkable talented people by GLOBAL standards. But like any cricket team, and especially the Pakistan cricket team, you can have enormous talent in your country but if the team do not play effectively nationally than that national human talent is wasted.

And so the best of these countries people are usually always end up working in the USA and UK. ........So the sum total of South Asia exports (1.5 billion) is less than Malaysia's (27 million). This is not because of the lack of ability, there has to be other explanations, and I tend to focus on geo-strategic reasoning's.

6) The characterization of the troublesome military in Muslim countries is CORRECT, usually without exception. Most are trained by the USA, and in the case of Pakistan and Bangladesh, the British through colonial history also exercise considerable input.

Both of us know that global Islamic terrorism does not exist and is a fiction perpetuated by America and their puppets around the world who have surrendered to American hegemony, or bribes, or out right criminal activity.

In the case of Pakistan specifically, the military/ISI have been the main propagators of the al-Qaeda myth and Taliban nuisance. Without the Pakistan military/ISI "cooperation" in this area with America over 30 years, such organizations would not have existed in the first place in peoples imagination or in reality. The Pakistan military are the main source of problems for Pakistani society, and for Pakistan's neighbors INDIA AND AFGHANISTAN.

But how does a sufficiently strong civilian leader rein in the military of such countries?

800,000 men under arms in the case of Pakistan, consuming and controlling large parts of the economy...very hard. Bhutto tried, as did Nawaz Sharif, but the military with the help of the Americans always dominated again.

In the case of Turkey with its even bigger military/MIT, backed by Israel and America, 1.1 million men under arms, you have an example of maybe a Turkish version of Mohammed Mahatir, Erdogan, and he has started an assault against the military by the arrest of many officers and generals linked to extreme groups attempting a coup against the AKP government.

Large sections of the Turkish military seem to tacitly approve his actions, BECAUSE he is delivering on the all important economic front providing jobs for Turks, increasing wealth and income for everybody.

Turkey now has the largest Muslim economy, and has the potential to achieve many great things as I have stated before. BUT Erdogan's success is only linked to the economic side, so long as he can deliver on this than all is well......then Erdogan has room to maneuver within Turkey.

By contrast far too many Muslim national leaders are thick on rhetoric but thin on real economic achievement. Many are corrupt, or outright agents of America (Musharaf).......or incapable (Karzai).

7) You correctly identify the importance of the Middle Class as the power house and work horse of any successful economy and the significant measures Mahatir took to propagate this class in Malaysia.

8) Regional cooperation is an important factor for any countries development. If you do not have regional stability with your neighbors, how than can you focus on the economy and other such vital national issues?

Pakistan and India being classic examples, where there is no real regional cooperation, but you have American/UK backed civilian puppets (Zardari) and military puppets (Busharaf) creating problems for the region. Where you have communication between the two countries through the national and international media, or worse still through the Americans and British, the real back seat trouble makers.

9) Good infrastructure. Malaysia through the good leadership of Mahatir has excellent infrastructure......no infrastructure....no development, simple.

10) Good communal relations, tactfully managing the aspirations of the various communal groups; Again this is the legacy of the "benovolent" British colonial rule who originally imported the Chinese and Indian coolies into the Malay peninsula, and the work of Mohammed Mahatir later.

By contrast look at Indonesia and the treatement of minorities, or even Pakistan, or Turkey. Development should mean national development for everybody.


~~