COMMENTS ON RON PAUL

Ron Paul - like Obama?

The 'very Jewish' columnist Melanie Phillips writes in the UK's Daily Mail:

"The really striking thing is the symmetry between Ron Paul and Barack Obama.

"Both are isolationists; both blame America for the terrorist war being waged against it... both take positions antithetical to the survival of America’s sole ally in the Middle East, the State of Israel."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2077660/The-symmetry-Ron-Paul-Obama-fearful-Gingrich-better.html#ixzz1hKuogibU

Melanie fails to mention Obama's CIA connections and Obama's attacks on Moslem countries such as Egypt, Syria and Pakistan.

We hope that Ron Paul is not another Obama.

"Obama lied about closing Guantanamo Bay. He lied about bringing the troops home. He re-signed the Patriot Act after saying that he would would not. Furthermore, Obama is targeting American citizens for assassination without due process..." (Ron Paul Should Be The Next President Of The United States - Forbes )

Yes, an article in Forbes supports Ron Paul.

Things are not always what they seem. TURKEY'S ERDOGAN IS JEWISH?

Here are extracts from some of the comments on "IOWA - LAUGHINGSTOCK OF THE COUNTRY".

Anonymous said...

This post seems contradictory.

On the one hand:

A neocon, Israeli firster, Jennifer Rubin, denounces Ron Paul; that should tell you something.

On the other hand:

Criticism of Paul's position on Sound Money.

I don't think a gold standard would be practical, but the underlining principle is Sound Money to avoid hyper-inflation.

Since 1913, when the Fed was created, the Dollar has decreased in value by 96% (that's a lot of inflation).

Ron Paul's main issue is to tackle the Federal Reserve System (private international bankers, who control the money supply).

The super rich are the ones who benefit from high inflation, as opposed to those on fixed incomes (retirees) and low incomes.

Huge amounts of credit (debt) is provided for the super rich to invest and buy up assets. Wealth is concentrated in the top 1%.

Or credit (debt) is extended to countries that can never repay the debt and in turn sign over natural resources and/or physical assets, or provide military bases, or set up laws favorable for foreign investors, which allow them to gain control of the most profitable parts of the economy, see Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins.

But with the creation of money "out of thin air" exceeding growth in the economy, inflation is the result.

Also, inflation is one way the Middle Class is reduced (the other way is outsourcing & offshoring).
Ron Paul stands against "inflation for the rich".

Ron Paul supports the idea that Sound Money will spur economic growth distributed up & down the economic ladder.

Khomeini - Mad Moslem or MI6 spy?

Mixed in are issues surrounding Ronald Reagan's condoning homosexuals in his administrations (both state & federal). What does that have to do with Ron Paul?

A number of Republicans supported Ronald Reagan.

The alternative was incumbent President Jimmy Carter, who had substantial backing from the Trilateral Commission (Carter was a member) founded by David Rockefeller.

Carter (Trilateral Commission?) policy caused stag-flation (inflation without economic growth). Reagan policy helped break the stag-flation cycle.

David Rockefeller supports 'one world government' and is a Bilderberg member (elite power group).

The Republican establishment backed George H. W. Bush in the nomination race against Reagan in 1980.

George H. W. Bush pushed for, quote, "a New World Order".

My perception is that Aangirfan is based in the United Kingdom (I could be wrong).

Perhaps, Aangirfan's understanding of American politics is incomplete.

At this point in time, Ron Paul is the best bet to stop this elite drive for a New World Order.

Aangirfan, I've been reading your website for a while (starting around the beginning of the so-called "Arab Spring"). I've learned quite a bit, including that the "Arab Spring" was not what it seemed.

But this post seems a bit on the nihilistic side.

Who else (who has a realistic chance to win) would stop this drive to U. S. would-wide hegemony?

Aangirfan, please research Ron Paul's foreign policy positions.

Please research Ron Paul's criticisms of the C.I.A. and secret U.S. foreign policy.

Ron Paul is honest and has integrity,

Ron Paul supports the U. S. Constitution and limited government (which is what the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect, along with individual rights).

For anybody who stands against the New World Order and other Globalist plans, Ron Paul is the candidate.

And for those in other countries, if you are not in favor of current U.S. foreign policy, Ron Paul is the candidate you should hope gets the Republican nomination and then wins the presidency.

The elite establishment of BOTH American political parties, Democratic & Republican, are against Ron Paul because he threatens to turn over their status quo apple cart.

What does that tell you?

Ron Paul with one of the bad guys.

Anonymous said...

Jeffifer Rubin quoted a Ron Paul newsletter: "In 1990, the newsletter cast aspersions on the 'tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise.'"

Aangirfan: Doesn't this match up with your own personal research?

Yes, it could be slightly exagerated, but the idea that there are many people, mostly Zionists, who help and/or work for Mossad, has substantial evidence to back it up.

Rich Lowery in another "hit piece", quoted Ron Paul: "In January 2010, he [Paul] declared: 'There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military.'"

Again, Aangirfan, doesn't this match up with your research?

Yes, it could be exagerated, but look at Operation Gladio and Libya, and, now, Syria, and a whole string of countries where the CIA toppled or tried to topple the government.

What about the CIA drone campaign in Pakistan? What about evidence that the CIA has been attempting to destablize or even break-up Pakistan?

Ron Paul is right on foreign policy.

Diplomacy and trade with other nations.

Military interventionism, no

Things are not always what they seem.

aferrismoon said...

Words chosen with a good amount of tongue-in-cheek?

'a nest of homosexuals at top levels of the Reagan administration may have been penetrated by Soviet-backed espionage agents posing as male prostitutes.'

'penetrated by Soviet-backed espionage agents the young farmboys hopped on their tractors and chugged off .....' :)

On a more serious not 'penetrating' US politics just before the wall came down seems either lucky or very well planned. One might imagine that the Sov regime penetrated both Dems and Reps.

Israel [for a while ] were aligned with the 'communist' states and then inexplicably turned to the US, beginning the slow but sure Israel-first totalitarianism.

cheers

Anonymous said...

Excellent synopsis, Aangirfan, nice summation of a viper's nest.

Everytime that I see a picture of Reagan, it reminds me of the Michael Jackson picture taken at the White House where Michael is standing between Ronald and Nancy who both look like they were having 'words'.

Somehow, I think Michael was ensnared in the vipers' nest.

A. Peasant said...

RP is the garbage man for the bankers.

His job is to get the fed out of the way so they can replace it and start fresh.


Ron Paul "believes the United States should shed its role as the world’s policeman and focus instead on its internal economic problems.

"Representative Ron Paul of Texas says he would cut a trillion dollars out of the federal budget his first year as president, in part by ending all foreign wars and foreign aid, including to Israel."

Ron Paul's foreign policy views draw support.


We have previously pointed out that Ron Paul was once a fan of Ronald Reagan.

'Michael'', in a comment on this blog, points out that Ron Paul has criticised Ronald Reagan:

Flashback 1987: Ron Paul Trashes Ronald Reagan Pensito Review

Letter written by Ron Paul:

"President Reagan... failed to exercise his constitutional responsibility to veto spending.

"Instead, he has encouraged it...

"America will suffer from a Reaganomics that is nothing but warmed-over Keynesianism...

"Reagan ... reneged ... on his pledge to abolish the Departments of Education and Energy, or to work against abortion...

"Knowing this administration’s record, I wasn’t surprised by its Libyan disinformation campaign, Israeli-Iranian arms-for-hostages swap, or illegal funding of the Contras."

Ron Paul's mentor Murray Rothbard on "the myth of criminal Reagan being conservative."

http://mises.org/daily/1544

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard60.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard54.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard49.html